For many years, Salesforce applications were powerful but often criticized for one thing: UI performance.
Pages felt:
● Heavy
● Slower to load
● Less responsive on large data volumes
● Difficult to scale as applications grew
Salesforce listened.
As customer expectations evolved faster apps, smoother UI, mobile-like experience Salesforce reached a critical realization:
“Performance cannot be fixed by optimization alone.
It must be fixed by architecture.”
This realization led to the creation of Lightning Web Components (LWC) and marked a strategic shift away from Aura Components.
This blog explains how and why Salesforce LWC delivers significantly better performance than Aura, not through marketing claims, but through architectural reality.
Before comparing performance, one thing must be clear:
Aura was not a failure.
Aura solved real problems:
● Component-based UI in Salesforce
● Dynamic rendering
● Client-side logic
● Reusable UI blocks
But Aura was built at a time when:
● Browsers were less powerful
● JavaScript engines were slower
● Web standards were less mature
Aura had to do more work internally because browsers could not.
As browsers evolved, Aura’s architecture became a bottleneck.
The single biggest performance difference comes down to this:
Aura relies on a heavy framework.
LWC relies on the browser.
This one decision changes everything.
LWC does not replace the browser.
Aura tries to manage the browser.
That architectural shift is the foundation of all performance gains.
Aura works by:
● Abstracting browser behavior
● Managing rendering through framework logic
● Handling DOM updates internally
● Interpreting UI changes via its own engine
This means:
● More JavaScript execution
● More framework overhead
● More memory usage
● More processing before UI updates
On small pages, this is manageable.
On enterprise-scale applications, it becomes expensive.
Salesforce LWC was designed with a different mindset:
“Let the browser do what it does best.”
LWC uses:
● Native browser APIs
● Standard JavaScript execution
● Optimized rendering paths
● Lightweight framework logic
This reduces:
● Execution layers
● Redundant processing
● Framework dependency
Performance improves not because LWC is “faster code,” but because there is less code doing unnecessary work.
Rendering is where users feel performance most.
In Aura:
● UI changes go through the Aura framework
● The framework decides what to update
● Virtual DOM-like processing happens internally
● Multiple abstraction layers are involved
Every UI update costs processing time.
In LWC:
● UI changes are handled by the browser
● Salesforce uses native rendering
● Only affected parts update
● No heavy interpretation layer
This results in:
● Faster initial load
● Smoother interactions
● Less UI lag
● Better scrolling performance
Users may not know why it feels faster but they feel it immediately.
JavaScript performance is another critical factor.
Aura:
● Uses its own component lifecycle
● Adds framework-level processing
● Executes additional checks and wrappers
● Handles more internal events
This increases:
● CPU usage
● Memory footprint
● Garbage collection pressure
LWC:
● Uses modern JavaScript standards
● Runs closer to native execution
● Avoids unnecessary abstractions
● Keeps logic minimal and focused
The result:
● Faster execution
● Cleaner memory usage
● Predictable behavior
This matters greatly in large applications with many components.
Modern browsers are powerful:
● Faster JavaScript engines
● Optimized DOM handling
● Native Web Component support
● Efficient memory management
Aura was built before browsers reached this level.
LWC was built because browsers reached this level.
Salesforce stopped fighting the browser and started using it properly.
Performance is not only about UI speed.
It is also about:
● How often data is fetched
● How efficiently it is processed
● How intelligently updates occur
LWC improves performance by:
● Reducing unnecessary server calls
● Managing data updates more predictably
● Avoiding excessive re-rendering
Aura often required more orchestration logic, which added overhead.
LWC enforces strong component isolation.
This improves performance because:
● Components update independently
● Changes do not cascade unnecessarily
● UI remains stable under load
Aura components were more tightly coupled, increasing the chance of:
● Chain reactions
● Unnecessary refreshes
● Slower composite rendering
In Aura:
● CSS was more global
● Conflicts were more common
● Debugging took longer
In LWC:
● CSS is scoped by default
● Styles apply only to the component
● No global recalculation storms
This improves:
● Rendering speed
● Maintainability
● UI stability
Small changes stay small.
Salesforce security enforcement affects performance.
LWC security is:
● Built into the rendering model
● Enforced at compile and runtime
● Predictable and consistent
Aura required more runtime checks.
LWC reduces runtime overhead by enforcing rules by design, not by constant verification.
One of Salesforce’s biggest priorities today is mobile performance.
LWC performs better on:
● Mobile devices
● Tablets
● Low-memory environments
● Slower CPUs
Because:
● Less JavaScript executes
● Rendering is native
● Components load efficiently
Aura struggles more in these environments due to framework overhead.
Performance is not only for users.
It also affects developers.
With LWC:
● Debugging is faster
● Components are simpler
● Performance issues are easier to isolate
● Optimization becomes more predictable
Developers write less code to achieve better performance.
That is a massive long-term advantage.
In large Salesforce implementations:
● Hundreds of components
● Complex record pages
● Multiple user roles
● Heavy data interaction
Aura pages often showed:
● Slower load times
● UI flickering
● Lag during interactions
LWC pages show:
● Faster load
● Smoother transitions
● Better scalability
This is why Salesforce itself promotes LWC for new development.
Salesforce has not deprecated Aura overnight, but the direction is clear.
Salesforce strategy:
● LWC for new development
● Aura for legacy maintenance
● Continuous optimization around LWC
This tells you something important:
Salesforce is investing in performance where the future lies.
Interviewers frequently ask:
● Why LWC is faster than Aura
● When to choose LWC over Aura
● What architectural differences exist
Candidates who answer confidently show:
● Platform understanding
● Architectural thinking
● Real-world awareness
Simply saying “LWC is faster” is not enough.
Explaining why is what sets you apart.
True performance combines speed with stability.
One often overlooked aspect:
Performance includes stability under load.
LWC improves:
● Predictability
● Scalability
● Reliability
This matters in enterprise environments where:
● Hundreds of users work simultaneously
● Data updates constantly
● UI must remain responsive
Aura struggled more under these conditions.
LWC aligns with:
● Modern browser optimization
● Standard JavaScript execution
● Efficient DOM handling
● Web Component principles
Aura does not.
This alignment ensures LWC remains performant as browsers evolve further.
All of this performance improvement happens within the Salesforce ecosystem.
Salesforce:
● Controls the platform
● Optimizes infrastructure
● Improves runtime engines
● Enhances browser integration
LWC is built to take advantage of these improvements automatically.
Aura is not.
Reality: It is faster because it is architecturally smarter.
Reality: Aura’s architecture limits how far optimization can go.
Reality: Slow apps reduce productivity and adoption.
Developers who understand performance differences:
● Make better design decisions
● Avoid legacy traps
● Build scalable solutions
● Grow into senior roles faster
Salesforce rewards architectural understanding.
Salesforce LWC did not:
● Patch Aura’s problems
● Add minor optimizations
● Change syntax for fun
It rethought how UI should work on the Salesforce platform.
By trusting the browser, reducing framework overhead, and enforcing clean architecture, LWC delivers performance that Aura simply cannot match at scale.
If performance matters to you and it should LWC is not optional.
It is the future.
1. Is Salesforce LWC always faster than Aura?
In most real-world scenarios, yes especially at scale.
2. Should I still learn Aura?
Only for maintaining legacy applications.
3. Does LWC improve page load time?
Yes. LWC significantly reduces initial load and re-rendering time.
4. Is LWC better for mobile performance?
Yes. LWC performs much better on mobile and low-resource devices.
5. Does performance improvement require extra effort in LWC?
No. Performance benefits come from architecture, not manual optimization.
6. Is this topic important for interviews?
Yes. It is a frequently asked and high-value interview topic.
7. Will Salesforce stop supporting Aura?
Aura will be supported for legacy systems, but new innovation focuses on LWC. Understanding the broader Salesforce platform that LWC integrates with is also key.
+91 8179191999
+91
8179191999
.jpg)
.jpg)
_Method.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
..jpg)
..jpg)
_Skills_&_Jobs.png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
..png)
.jpg)
.png)
_8_Weeks_to_Career_Success.png)
..png)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_Skills,_Syllabus,_and_Career_Roadmap.png)
.png)
.png)
_Implementation_in_Playwright_A_Complete_Non-Coding_Guide_(1).png)
..png)
.png)
.png)
..png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_NARESH_IT.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_.png)
.png)
_(1).png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_with_AWS_CloudFormation.png)
_Best_Practices_in_Multi-Cloud.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png){kind=spacer}
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_(1).png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
_A_Beginner-Friendly_Guide.png)
